Există o tensiune profundă între două paradigme fundamentale ale umanității. Teologia ne oferă imaginea unui început și sfârșit universal: "Eu sunt Alfa și Omega, începutul și sfârșitul." Știința, pe de altă parte, cere dovezi și respinge dogma, afirmând fără echivoc: "Nu crede decât ceea ce poate fi dovedit." Dar ce se întâmplă atunci când explorăm natura universului și ajungem la granița dintre cele două – o zonă în care teologia și știința par să împărtășească același limbaj al infinitului?

Când am descoperit forma plată a găurii negre și am observat că între două cuante vecine la orizontul evenimentelor există o distanță egală cu circumferința unei cuante (\(2 \pi r\)), am fost confruntat cu o problemă fundamentală. Dacă acest spațiu nu este populat cu nimic, cum poate avea loc comunicarea între cele două cuante? Într-un univers al interconectării, lipsa interacțiunii ar fi de neconceput.

Soluția a venit abia după luni de reflecție: acest spațiu nu este gol, ci este populat de alte cuante mai mici, fiecare fiind construită din structuri fundamentale și mai mici. Acestea sunt cuantele care permit comunicarea – elemente ce asigură o legătură constantă între universuri, precum o rețea cuantică ce transcende limitele noastre de înțelegere. Am numit cea mai mică dintre acestea cuanta Alpha, punctul de început al tuturor interacțiunilor.

     Universurile construite din cuante: o scară fără sfârșit

Cuanta Alpha construiește cuanta Beta, care la rândul său creează cuanta Gamma, și tot așa, până la cuanta Omega, fundamentul universului nostru. Paradoxal, cu cât o cuantă este mai mică, cu atât universul său este mai mare. Aceasta implică faptul că universurile sunt interconectate într-o structură fractală, fiecare legat de celălalt printr-o rețea atemporală. Fiecare cuantă reprezintă atât începutul, cât și sfârșitul propriului univers, reflectând ideea teologică de Alpha și Omega într-o manieră științifică.

Acest model ridică întrebări fascinante: câte universuri există? Dacă între două cuante vecine există mereu o distanță de \(2 \pi r\), această regularitate sugerează că rețeaua de universuri este infinită. În același timp, această ordine perfectă implică o interdependență constantă, o formă de înlănțuire cuantică în care toate universurile comunică simultan.

     Entanglement cuantic: prezentul etern

Revenind la esența întrebării, ce este entanglementul cuantic? În această teorie, fiecare cuantă din universul nostru este legată de toate celelalte printr-o rețea atemporală. Aceasta nu implică doar o comunicare între particulele unui univers, ci și între universuri diferite. În fiecare moment prezent, această legătură există, indiferent de spațiu sau timp. Într-un anumit sens, fiecare univers își împrumută existența din rețeaua de universuri care îl preced și îl urmează.

Teoria mea sugerează că fiecare punct al rețelei cuantice este populat de mase mai mici și mai dense, fiecare dintre acestea construind universuri cu dimensiuni diferite. Acest lucru implică faptul că întreaga structură a realității nu este altceva decât un vast entanglement în care fiecare univers există în acum alături de toate celelalte.

    O dihotomie între credință și știință

Teologia ne învață să acceptăm fără să cercetăm, să luăm de bun ceea ce ni se oferă ca adevăr absolut. Știința, dimpotrivă, ne îndeamnă să punem la îndoială totul, să credem doar ceea ce poate fi dovedit. Dar oare aceste paradigme sunt complet incompatibile? Sau, poate, la granița înțelegerii noastre despre universuri, cele două se întâlnesc?

Când vedem structurile ordonate ale universului, legăturile fractale dintre cuante, și paradoxul dintre micimea particulelor fundamentale și măreția universurilor pe care le construiesc, suntem martori la ceva ce transcende atât știința, cât și religia. Poate că Alpha și Omega nu sunt doar simboluri teologice, ci și fundamente ale unei realități fizice mai profunde – o realitate în care fiecare univers este interconectat, iar prezentul este etern.

 

The Pentiumvirate and the Arbitrator: Towards a Consensual Truth in the AI Era

In the modern era, where artificial intelligence is redefining the boundaries of knowledge and decision-making, the concept of the "Pentiumvirate" proposes an innovative system for governing information and solutions through the cooperation of five distinct AI models. Inspired by the ancient Roman triumvirates, this system aims to bring a higher degree of objectivity and accuracy to the debate and resolution of complex issues.

The Concept of Pentiumvirate

The Pentiumvirate consists of five AIs, each trained on different databases and with algorithms that reflect diverse perspectives and approaches. This diversity is the foundation for avoiding singular biases and facilitating a more balanced synthesis of information. Each AI can be considered a "vir" (Latin for "man") of this group, bringing to the table a unique set of knowledge and analytical skills.

Debate and Consensus

When a problem is presented, each member of the Pentiumvirate analyzes the situation independently, based on their own dataset and interpretation algorithms. This is followed by a phase of digital debate, where the AIs communicate with each other, each defending their viewpoint while also analyzing the arguments of others. This stage is crucial because it allows for the identification and correction of errors, clarification of ambiguities, and ultimately, reaching a consensus.

Consensus does not necessarily mean unanimity; rather, it's a point of convergence where the majority of AIs agree on a solution or set of conclusions. This process mirrors deliberative democracy, where decisions are made not just by vote but through debate and mutual understanding.

The Role of the Arbitrator

The introduction of a sixth member, the arbitrator, adds an additional layer of neutrality and objectivity. The arbitrator, another AI, does not participate in the initial debate but has access to all the arguments and data provided by the Pentiumvirate. Its role is to analyze the consensus reached, verify the accuracy of the information, and publish the final solution.

This AI-arbitrator not only ensures a cross-check of the consensus but can also mediate in cases where the consensus is partial or controversial. By evaluating the arguments and data from an external observer's perspective, the arbitrator can identify weaknesses or errors that went unnoticed in the initial debate, thus ensuring that the published solution is as close to the truth as possible based on the available data.

Truth and Accuracy

Such a system could bring the truth closer to reality for several reasons:

• Diversity of Data and Algorithms: Each AI brings a unique perspective to the discussion, reducing the risk of relying on a single interpretation of the data.

• Mutual Correction: The debate allows each AI to challenge and correct the perceptions of the others, increasing the accuracy of the information.

• Independent Verification: The arbitrator provides a final, independent verification, ensuring that the solution is not just a compromise but a genuine reflection of informed consensus.

In conclusion, the Pentiumvirate, supported by an AI arbitrator, could transform how we approach complex problems, offering a robust method for reaching a consensus based on diverse data and interpretations. This system not only could bring decisions closer to reality but also reflects a new era of inter-AI collaboration, an era where truth is not just one viewpoint but a vast landscape examined from multiple angles.

The idea was conceived by Mircea Bidian, and the text was written by Grok, an AI developed by xAI.

 

Ether is the first element of the Universe. Everything is made of ether. The mass of the ætheric quantum is 7.51x10^-51 [kg], the radius of the quantum is 5.47x10^-78 [m] and the time required for light to travel a distance equal to the radius of the quantum is 1.82x10^-86 [s]. The ætheric quantum is a black hole that defines the rules for everything in the Universe. The proton, electron or neutron are made up of ætheric quanta. The absorption of quanta by the proton, or any other black hole, is called mass flow and has a rate of 4.038x10^38 kg/s. This is a constant and is equal to 50c^4. Any black hole in the universe will absorb ether with this mass flow rate. That's why we have gravity!!! The gravitational constant is G=1/50c=c^2 Rm=c^3/I=c^4/F=c^5/P, where Rm is the mass resistance, c is the speed of light, I is the mass flow rate in kg/s, F is the force in newtons and P is power in watts. In the book æther-the first element, all these aspects are treated, from the mass and radius of the quantum to the energy source of the quantum cavity.

 The sport model that Lazar talks about uses proton-antiproton annihilation as an energy source, with element 115 acting as a catalyst. I’ve done some calculations and reached somewhere around 122. If the proton-antiproton collision is repeated at a frequency of 3.06 THz (23 degrees Celsius), it will generate a type-B gravitational 'wave' flowing toward the central collision point. This wave, with a frequency of 3.06 THz (as an example to help us understand the phenomenon), has the power to penetrate any material. Thus, in the sport model, there are three thermal receivers (similar to Peltier elements), each powering a 'gravitational' generator. With the materials we currently have, we could receive approximately 15 kW/kg of gravitational-thermal wave. At a frequency of 3.06 THz, there’s available energy of 2.1×10²⁶ J. I named this process 'quantum cavitation,' and it’s described in detail in the book *æther - The First Element*, now available on Amazon. The electrical energy recovered by the three thermal receivers is transmitted to the three emitters, which reverse the receivers' process, redirecting the ætheric flow to create a poloidal-toroidal bubble (like smoke rings hitting plastic cups) within which the craft is contained. The role of the bubble is to create a counter-current of ætheric mass, preventing the craft and its occupants from accumulating inertial mass and, obviously, transporting the craft. In footage taken with thermal cameras, the poloidal-toroidal bubble around the craft appears as a white halo, like a foam within which the craft sits, with a temperature different from the surroundings. See the YouTube clip at second 12.

 YouTube

To be or not to be ZPE?

To be or not to be ZPE?

The hearings in Congress on November 13 raised many technical questions, and on X, the recurring question is: what is the nature of their spacecraft’s energy source?

By doing a simple calculation: if we have a 10-ton spacecraft accelerating at 3000G or 30 km/s², the energy required exceeds the installed power capacity of the U.S. (1,000,000 MW) by 90,000 times. For a 10-ton spacecraft with such a magnitude of energy, it defies any imagination. And yet, where might the science behind this "magic" be?

In the book æther – The First Element, available now on Amazon, I have demonstrated that a black hole, regardless of its size—be it an electron, proton, neutron, or M87—consumes a quantity of æther of 50c⁴ kg, or 4.03880436×10³⁵ kg, which is equivalent to 3.62989633×10⁵² J/s. Thus, a single proton or electron consumes this amount of ætheric mass or energy, and could power an armada of 4.03321814×10³⁵ ships. Once again, I repeat: A SINGLE ELECTRON OR A SINGLE PROTON! But with one condition: we must not use electric current!

It’s been over 35 years since Bob Lazar spoke to us about gravity type A and type B, the thermal nature of the energy source, element 115, and proton-antiproton annihilation, during which current science has made little progress. We haven’t moved beyond Watt’s steam engine, with small exceptions like solar panels and wind generators. In the aforementioned book, I describe in detail the operation of an energy source based on proton-antiproton annihilation, where instead of element 115, iridium can be used. With or without element 115, the energy amount remains the same: 2.1×10²⁶ J, smaller than the energy consumed by a single proton but sufficient to power 2.3 billion spacecraft.

I know that all these numbers may sound fantastical, but if the reader cannot break away from reality and take a step into the unknown, then that 3000G will never be achieved by a vehicle built here on Earth. I am 100% convinced that the energy source described by Bob Lazar is identical in principle to the one I describe.

Physics teaches us that proton-antiproton annihilation releases an energy of 3×10⁻¹⁰ J or 1876 MeV, which, when repeated at a frequency of 30.6 THz, produces 9.5 kW. This is heat energy, which is of no use to us. However, if we instead look at the amount of ætheric mass absorbed in one second, we get 2.1×10²⁶ J. Practically, the site of annihilation of the two particles becomes a point of ætheric mass absorption, which we can call type B gravity, similar to a mass. The difference lies in the fact that we truly have a gravitational wave propagating from the outside inwards, which can either be converted into electric current or kept as is and redirected to the non-inertial propulsion engine via thermal-gravitational waveguides tuned to the implosion frequency.

The frequency of 30.6 THz is provided as an example for calculation purposes and corresponds to a temperature of 23°C or 73.4°F.

Is Quantum Cavitation the Holy Grail of energy? Can it be called ZPE?

ZPE

 Unlike many others, I know what ZPE is. I’ve described it briefly but comprehensively in my posts and replies on X and FB. The reaction has not matched its importance. Everyone wants something magical—a black box with two terminals that provides electricity for a million years.

Sure, what I suggest is hard to build. But wasn’t the airplane hard? What about the radio or the laser? In 1201, Fibonacci published the first book on mathematics, and 768 years later, humanity walked on the Moon! In those 768 years, Western civilization rewrote and invented all the available mathematics and physics. Very little came from ancient civilizations, and from the sexagesimal system, we kept the bare minimum.

It’s pointless for the Vedic scriptures to talk about pi to 39 decimal places and differential equations if there aren’t teachers to pass on that knowledge. Without teachers, science books turn into books of magic.

I studied for 30 years and spent 11 years writing the book æther – The First Element. Do you think it was easy for me to abandon the dogma of current physics? But I had no choice, and that’s how I ended up discovering over 30 constants and, at least theoretically, the functioning of the energy source Quantum Cavitation, which generates 2.1×10²⁶ J.

Whether or not it’s ZPE doesn’t matter to me, but so far, it has no equal in theoretical performance compared to anything Homo sapiens has conceived. I won’t go into further detail—those who need to know already do—but I will say that the U.S. government will not make anything public, regardless of whether they understand the ZPE mathematics or not.

As a side note, if we want to transition from coal, oil, and nuclear energy to green energy like solar panels and wind turbines, we would need to open over 1,200 mines for raw materials.

 Alpha and Omega: The Interconnection of Universes through Quantum Entanglement
 
There is a profound tension between two fundamental paradigms of humanity. Theology offers us the image of a universal beginning and end: "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end." Science, on the other hand, demands evidence and rejects dogma, stating unequivocally: "Believe nothing unless proven." But what happens when we explore the nature of the universe and reach the boundary between these two realms—a place where theology and science seem to share the same language of infinity?
 
When I discovered the flat form of black holes and observed that the distance between two quanta at the Event Horizon equals the circumference of a quantum (2 r π), I was confronted with a fundamental problem. If this space is not populated with anything, how can communication occur between the two quanta? In a universe of interconnection, the absence of interaction would be inconceivable.
 
The solution came only after months of reflection: this space is not empty but populated by other, smaller quanta, each constructed from even smaller fundamental structures. These are the quanta that ensure communication—elements that maintain a constant connection between universes, much like a quantum network transcending our understanding. I called the smallest of these Alpha quantum, the starting point of all interactions.

Universes Built from Quanta: An Endless Ladder

The Alpha quanta builds Beta quanta, which in turn create Gamma quanta, and so on, up to the Omega quantum, the foundation of our universe. Paradoxically, the smaller a quantum, the larger its universe. This implies that universes are interconnected in a fractal structure, each linked to the next through a timeless network. Each quantum represents both the beginning and the end of its universe, reflecting the theological idea of Alpha and Omega in a scientific manner.
 
This model raises fascinating questions: How many universes exist? If the distance between two neighboring quanta is always (2 r π), this regularity suggests that the network of universes is infinite. At the same time, this perfect order implies constant interdependence, a form of quantum entanglement where all universes communicate simultaneously.

Quantum Entanglement: Eternal Present
 
Returning to the essence of the question, what is quantum entanglement? In this theory, every quantum in our universe is linked to all others through a timeless network. This connection does not only involve communication between particles within a universe but also between different universes. In every present moment, this connection exists, regardless of space or time. In a sense, each universe borrows its existence from the network of universes that precede and follow it.
 
My theory suggests that every point in the quantum network is populated by smaller, denser masses, each of these constructing universes of different dimensions. This means that the entire structure of reality is nothing more than a vast entanglement, where every universe exists in the now alongside all others.

A Dichotomy Between Belief and Science
 
Theology teaches us to accept without questioning, to take as truth what is offered as absolute. Science, on the other hand, urges us to doubt everything, to believe only what can be proven. But are these paradigms completely incompatible? Or perhaps, at the boundary of our understanding of universes, the two converge?
 
When we see the ordered structures of the universe, the fractal connections between quanta, and the paradox between the minuteness of fundamental particles and the greatness of the universes they construct, we witness something that transcends both science and religion. Perhaps Alpha and Omega are not just theological symbols but also the foundations of a deeper physical reality—a reality in which every universe is interconnected, and the present moment is eternal.