Will Quantum Cavitation Be the Energy Source of the Future?
By Mircea Bidian
We have a well-documented history of the existence of æther, or more precisely,
of its non-existence. Although we have considerable reasons for thorough
analysis, we must start with Bernhard Riemann, who assumed in 1853 that:
...the gravitational æther is an
incompressible fluid and normal matter
represents sinks in this æther. So,
if the æther is destroyed or absorbed
in proportion to the masses within
the bodies, a stream arises and carries
all surrounding bodies in the
direction of the central mass. Riemann
speculated that the absorbed æther is
transferred into another world or
dimension.
Not many years after Riemann's conjecture, in 1865, we have Maxwell, who could
not have developed his monumental theory without the concept of æther. The
first properties of æther—permeability and permittivity—began to emerge.
The key to Pandora's box would be found by Planck in 1900 when he discovered
the constant that bears his name, with a value of h = 6.62607015×10−34
J. Modern science considers Planck's constant to be an angular momentum, which,
of course, is a significant error, but this is another story I will return to
later.
In 1905, Einstein revealed to us the equation that equates energy and mass, E =
m×c², and at the same time began to deny the concept of æther. At that time,
æther was seen as a medium without properties, and space as a container. This
denial of the existence of æther lasted only 11 years, from 1905 to 1916, when,
in a letter to Lorentz, Einstein says:
This new ether theory, however, would
not violate the principle of relativity
because the state of this gμv=ether
would not be that of a rigid body in an
independent state of motion, but
every state of motion would be a function of
position determined through the
material processes.
As we can see, the new æther is represented by the components of the metric
tensor gμv, conceived as a field with a structure dependent on the material
processes that determine the movement of a body's mass.
In 1919, in the Morgan manuscript, Einstein says:
...in 1905, I was of the opinion that
it was no longer allowed to speak about
the ether in physics. This opinion,
however, was too radical.
Also, in 1919, in a letter to Lorentz, he regrets denying æther:
It would have been more right if I
had limited myself in my earlier
publications to emphasizing only the
non-existence of an ether
velocity, instead of arguing the
total non-existence of the ether,
for I can see that with the word
ether we say nothing else than that
space has to be viewed as a carrier
of physical qualities.
The damage was done, and simple regret was not enough; æther, with or without properties,
became verbum non grata, and the concept was gradually forgotten as a
metaphysical artifact from a bygone scientific era.
After 1916, the space-time concept became the new æther in the theory of
relativity.
On May 5, 1920, in an essay published by Einstein at Leiden University, titled
Äther und Relativitätstheorie (Ether and Relativity), he concludes by saying:
Recapitulating, we may say that
according to the general theory of relativity,
space is endowed with physical
qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists
an ether. According to the general
theory of relativity, space without ether is
unthinkable; for in such space, there
would not only be no propagation of light
but also no possibility of existence
for standards of space and time (measuring
rods and clocks), nor therefore any
space-time intervals in the physical sense.
But this ether may not be thought of
as endowed with the quality characteristic
of ponderable media, as consisting of
parts that may be tracked through time.
The idea of motion may not be applied
to it.
Nearly 20 years later, in 1938, Einstein reminds us:
We may still use the word ether, but
only to express the physical properties of
space. This word ether has changed
its meaning many times in the development of
science. At the moment, it no longer
stands for a medium built up of particles.
Its story, by no means finished, is
continued by relativity theory.
Of course, the story is not over, and the appearance of gravitational æther
also brings about the appearance of electric and magnetic æther. Why? For the
simple reason that we do not have one æther that possesses all these
properties. In my book, æther - The First Element, it was only when
the gravitational constant became equal to the electric impulse constant that I
realized, unintentionally, that I had managed to attribute all the properties
to a single æther. My goal has always been to write a physics that allows me to
calculate the inertialess propulsion engine (warp drive) and nothing else. And
when I realized that for a 1,000-ton ship, I would need the energy of 245
Earth-like planets, I wanted to erase everything.
It was clear that the energy source, power transfer, and the engine itself had
to be units with 100% efficiency, with superconductors at room temperature. A
few more months passed, and tormented by the problem of the energy source, on
the morning of January 1, 2023, I made the first calculations of what would
later become the final technical chapter of my book, called Quantum Cavitation.
This energy source is based on the pseudo-gravitational flow of æther towards
the central point of the implosion of two black holes between a proton and an
antiproton.
When the two black holes collapse, the spin becomes zero, and the
gravitational/centrifugal/centripetal force disappears, leaving the absolute
vacuum of space at the two black holes to be filled by quanta from the
immediate vicinity. Since the black hole is a 2D space and has a flat shape, upon
implosion, a planar wave is generated, which must be transformed into a
spherical wave. This is also a challenge, which I believe can be solved by
bombarding an acidic medium with very low-velocity antiproton flux. If the
implosion frequency is 30.6 THz, which equals a temperature of 23℃ (73.4℉ or
296.15 K), then we have an available energy of 2.1×10²⁶ J. The energy generated
by the Sun is 3.86×10²⁶ J.
References:
L. Kostro, "Einstein and the Ether," Apeiron, 2000.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.